This portfolio includes my completed work from the Colorado State University AGRI 547: Delivery of Cooperative Extension Programs course. In this course, I focused on developing a hypothetical program titled "Beef Without the Buzzwords: Making Informed Choices at the Store." Devan Catalano (Colorado State University) and Teresa Steckler (University of Illinois) were my mentors throughout this process.
This portfolio highlights key components of the Extension pipeline, demonstrating my ability to assess needs, design programming, and communicate outcomes, while reflecting on my growth over the semester.
This section highlights the initial design of “Beef Without the Buzzwords: Making Informed Choices at the Store,” focusing on the transition from identified needs to program structure.
A brief needs assessment was conducted using an online survey distributed through Qualtrics. The survey was sent to 15 individuals, with 9 responses received. Participants who selected “disagree” to the consent question in Block 1 were automatically exited from the survey.
To supplement survey data, three interviews were conducted—two via video call and one in person. Participants for both the survey and interviews were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling methods.
Survey and Interview Protocol
The protocols were developed to gather input from a general audience of consumers on their knowledge, perceptions, and decision-making related to beef purchasing, ensuring that program design was grounded in audience-identified needs.
This blueprint presents the foundational structure of the program, guiding its development from identified need to planned implementation.
A clear understanding of the target audience is essential for successful program design. This section presents the community audience profile used to guide decisions related to content, delivery, and engagement.
This section demonstrates the transition from concept to execution, organizing program goals into a clear plan with defined timelines, activities, and expected outcomes.
This guide details the planning process for the in-person event, including logistics, coordination, and considerations to support a successful and engaging program.
This section outlines the roles and responsibilities of volunteers supporting program delivery at a farmers' market, including their contributions to outreach and audience engagement.
Note: This assignment was developed with the help of ChatGPT, as directed by the course instructor.
This table integrates key program components, linking content and materials with appropriate evaluation tools and measurable outcomes.
This report highlights program outcomes and outlines how success can be measured and communicated to stakeholders to demonstrate impact and accountability.
NOTE: These results are simulated using ClaudeAI since the program is hypothetical.
Sara Edwards (classmate) and I collaborated on developing a scholarly article using data from a Colorado equine needs assessment conducted by Devan Catalano. It is not posted here yet because we are in the submission process. This section will be updated with our work once the final manuscript is reviewed and published.
While my discussions with my mentors were extremely influential in my progress this semester, I think that's the invisible labor. Both mentors provided different perspectives on the same issue because they had different specialties, experiences, and were from different regions of the US. Working with them was my favorite part of this course because I could come up with an idea and then get constructive feedback on how to improve it. I have not formally worked in Extension, so their feedback and advice were essential.
I am most confident in my program blueprint. I used results from my needs assessment to inform the program. When I first came up with the program idea, I didn’t have a clear way to reach an interested audience. I contemplated ideas like a staffed booth at the grocery store, but realized that people are not always interested in chatting while running errands. With the help of my mentors, I learned that extension programming does not have to be cookie-cutter. Using methods that work is more important than using the same methods we have always used. This was how the idea for “The Social Study” lecture came about.
Continued conversations also helped me identify specific sub-audiences interested in this topic. By identifying those audiences, I was able to better plan how to get the printed materials or social media posts to those individuals. Ideas came up like sharing materials on social media interest groups or sharing event information on these interest groups. We could also prepare the same material content-wise, but emphasize the importance in relation to the interests.
I still need to practice implementing a program. The courses I have taken have prepared me to create a program, but implementation is a different story. I plan to create the material I would use for the in-person lecture and test it with my mentors to get their feedback. This will help me take my program a step further and better understand how it might run in real life.
This course has helped me become better prepared for a career in extension. I now have many resources to turn to when it is time to plan a program. I also have connections I know I can reach out to for a unique, experienced perspective!
Determining how a program is delivered is critical to its success. This section highlights the process of selecting delivery methods that best align with audience preferences, access, and learning needs.
This section compiles key resources and sources used to support program development, providing reliable, research-based information relevant to the topic and Extension practice.